ivo.sk
  search
IVO BAROMETER: Quality of democracy in the 1st quarter-year of 2012: decline to 2,8

On May 16, 2012 Institute for Public Affairs posted on an assessment of the development quality of democracy in Slovakia for the first quarter of 2012.

Within the project IVO Barometer, analysts from Institute for Public Affairs in cooperation with other experts evaluate the quality development of democracy in Slovakia in the first quarter of the year 2012 by overall mark 2.8 - which means a slight decline in comparison to the fourth quarter of 2011 – the democracy worsened by 0.2 points.

Experts preparing the assessment within IVO Barometer found that the overall rating has worsened due to negative trends in the area of legislation and the area of human and minority rights. The state of democracy in the two remaining areas has not changed. From 2012, there is a verbal evaluation of the quality of democracy in the area of civil society within the IVO Barometer.



Download

IVO Newsletter - Barometer: 1st quarter of 2012 (Slovak only)

IVO Barometer

The principal objective of the IVO Barometer, an analytical project by the Institute for Public Affairs, is to provide a foundation of basic knowledge about the actual state of affairs and development trends in the field of quality of democracy, and to put together an operative team of experts and regularly publish their assessments.

The backbone of the project is the regular evaluation of the quality of democracy in Slovakia after it became a full-fledged member of the European Union. The project’s methodology is based on systematic monitoring and analysis of the main development trends in five key areas: democratic institutions and the rule of law; legislation; projection and implementation of human and minority rights; performance of independent and public service media; and civil society.

Photo


IVO Barometer 1/2012 was introduced on a press conference by Miroslav Kollár, Grigorij Mesežnikov and Martin Bútora.

The project is supported by the Embassy of the United States of America and Konrad Adenauer Stiftung. 

***

The Slovak Spectator released an article about the latest IVO BAROMETER:

Slovak democracy gets an average grade

4 Jun 2012, Michaela Terenzani – Stanková, The Slovak Spectator

NEITHER extraordinary praise nor harsh criticism was in the report card assessing the quality of Slovak democracy during the first quarter of 2012 based on a barometer prepared by the Institute for Public Affairs (IVO), a non-governmental organisation. IVO released the results of its regular survey analysing the status of democracy in Slovakia on May 16 and stated that the country was only average and that the country’s overall grade had dropped slightly from the previous quarter.

Slovakia’s overall grade in the IVO Barometer of democracy was 2.8 on a scale where 1 is excellent and 5 is failed, the grading system typically used in Slovak schools. IVO stated that the best grade can be achieved only when Slovakia has optimal democracy based on the standards and comparative criteria used by the European Union and the Council of Europe in measuring the stability of political institutions, political democracy and human rights. IVO said the drop of 0.2 points in the first quarter compared to the previous quarter was caused by negative trends in the areas of legislation and human and minority rights.

The IVO Barometer evaluates four areas of democracy: democratic institutions and a lawful state (giving Slovakia a grade of 2.5 in the first quarter); legislation (a grade of 2.5); respect for and protection of human and minority rights (a grade of 3.0); and media freedom and the quality of public-service media (a grade of 3.0).

The first quarter barometer monitored a period in which the government changed in Slovakia after the March 10 parliamentary election. This is reflected in the analyses written by experts from IVO about each of the four areas, noting that the results were influenced by both the cabinet led by Iveta Radičová, comprising four centre-right parties (July 2010-March 2012), and the new cabinet led by Robert Fico with a one-party government after Smer won an absolute majority of seats in the March election.

Legislation stymied at end of Radičová’s term

IVO president Grigorij Mesežnikov, the author of the analysis of legislation in Slovakia, wrote that responsibility in this area rests with the previous government led by Radičová.

“The end of the term was really marked by a somewhat weaker concept in the area of preparation and passing legislative proposals,” Mesežnikov wrote, adding that some steps taken by the government in the legislative arena were just reactions to problems facing the cabinet and the quality of legislative proposals suffered for that reason.

The IVO Barometer reported that the lower grade in the area of human and minority rights was a result of the new cabinet.

“The way the government has approached this area, not only regarding its presented intentions but also some specific steps that were taken such as ending the post of deputy prime minister for human rights and minorities, is something that violates the verbally declared status quo that the government said they wanted to stick with,” Mesežnikov stated in presenting the barometer results, while adding that this is why the IVO experts found it appropriate to lower Slovakia’s grade in this area.

Prime Minister Fico reacted negatively to the analyses released by IVO.

“It’s really strange that the government received the parliament’s trust only on Tuesday [parliament approved the government’s programme on May 15] and Mr Mesežnikov is already announcing that democracy in Slovakia has worsened – that is perhaps because we won the elections,” stated Fico, as quoted by the SITA newswire. The prime minister was also critical of the IVO Barometer analyses during his first term from 2006 to 2010, adding that it is not a crime that Smer won the parliamentary elections in March.

“We will not apologise to anybody, especially not to Mr Mesežnikov, for having won the elections,” Fico stated, as quoted by SITA.

Mesežnikov said that Fico’s reaction means that he apparently has not read the analyses in the IVO Barometer.

“If he knew the content of our analytical results, he would probably have a different reaction to what has been said and he would perhaps not accuse our analysts of not being objective towards his government,” Mesežnikov stated.

Civil society evaluated

Beginning in 2012 the IVO Barometer started evaluating the status of civil society and the so-called third sector in Slovakia, with the first quarterly evaluation presented only in a narrative text without a numerical score. The next quarterly report will include a numerical grade.

“It is a natural part of the functioning of democracy,” said IVO analyst Martin Bútora, as quoted by SITA, during presentation of the results. Bútora authored the chapter on civil society.

Civil society made some advances during Radičová’s past term when some initiatives and projects culminated, according to Bútora, while adding that the change in government has provoked concern among some organisations in the third sector.

“First, the cabinet did not invite representatives from the non-governmental sector to the meeting of social partners and there were questions over how the plans and projects of civil society would be anchored in the programme statement of the government as well as over the cancellation of the deputy prime minister [post] for human rights and national minorities,” Bútora stated, as quoted by SITA. But SITA wrote that Bútora appreciated that Prime Minister Fico and several state secretaries (i.e. deputy ministers) from various ministries attended a meeting with NGOs on May 14.

http://spectator.sme.sk/articles/view/46549/2/
slovak_democracy_gets_an_average_grade.html

 



>> Back to News

V4 is primarily based on cooperation in the domain of politics. But how is it perceived by the inhabitants of individual countries? 

What encourages some actors to promote ties with a declining power with aggressive foreign policy and undemocratic regime?

Visegrad Four as Viewed by the Public
Who Is Playing Russian Roulette in Slovakia

Socio-economic aspect of migration, aspect of integration of migrants and refugees and domestic political aspect of migration in V4.

Political leaders have undermined the public perception of unanimity. V4 countries have been divided on certain aspects of the conflict.

Phantom Menace. The Politics and Policies of Migration in Central Europe
Diverging Voices, Converging Policies. V4 Reactions to the Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Historical, political and ideological aspects of the right-wing extremism in central Europe.

Book on new political parties in Slovakia, Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland.

Extremism vs. Democracy in Central Europe: Issues, Experiences, Challenges
Alternative Politics? The Rise of New Political Parties in Central Europe

Collection of analytical studies from experts from Great Britain, France, Norway, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia.

Confronting the dark sides of the past and considering the participation of Christians in public life.

Conspiracy Theories in Europe
Tiso's Ghost in 2016 Slovakia
Content © 2006 Inštitút pre verejné otázky.
Design © 2006 Komplot
Generated by Buxus content management system from ui42.


tlačiťposlaťhore