ivo.sk
  search
Otvorené okná

Country and year of production
SR, 2000

Director
Kirchhoff Robert

Screenplay
Kirchhoff Robert

Director of photography
Kollár Martin

Film editor
Varga Roman

Language
Slovak/English subtitles

Annotation

Robert Kirchhoff, 2.4. 2000: The title “Open Windows” is a metaphor for the opportunity of young and talented Slovaks to leave the confines of their own home and venture abroad. Aside from carrying certain economic advantages, emigration presents them with the freedom to choose a desired workplace within a competitive environment. They prefer western Europe and the United States, as these countries value their abilities the most, and provide favorable conditions for achieving career success. Young people depart Slovakia out of a desire for a more comfortable and problem-free life. Many of them are disillusioned by their country’s development, that is increasingly affected by the unfavorable political situation. The shared values of a common state comprised of Czechs and Slovaks reinforced by the fresh experience of the “Velvet revolution” no longer apply. Many Slovak graduates of Czech universities have responded to this fact by staying in the Czech Republic after the split. For this reason, the film Open Windows was shot entirely in Prague. Prague’s role as the previously shared capital that has turned into a foreign city for many young Slovaks is paradoxical. This paradox plays a pivotal role in the film. The majority of young people, however do not consider themselves to be emigrants. They consider Prague to be an extension of their home country. The filming was done primarily in the Prague metro, a place where the inhabitants of Prague meet on their anonymous trips to work, meetings, shopping centers, and home. The metro was selected in order to portray the subjects in the most accurate and realistic manner. Despite their unique life stories and differing motives for departure, these young people share the experience of being a Slovak living in Prague right after the break-up of Czechoslovakia. Their answers to questions of whether they still consider the Czech Republic their homeland, provides an insight into their relation to the country in which they have decided to live and at the same time reveals their relation to Slovakia, the country in which they were born.




Product details
  Run time 17
  Medium videotape
  Projection format VHS, color



>> Back to Films & Multimedia

V4 is primarily based on cooperation in the domain of politics. But how is it perceived by the inhabitants of individual countries? 

Analysis of the situation and prospects for development in two areas related to Slovakia's attitudes towards Ukraine.

V4 at the Time of Polycrisis. Public Perception
Словаччина та Україна: перспективи співпраці та гравці

Attitudes of representatives of institutions and politicians towards Russian aggression & public opinion.

The key areas of the development of the country’s security and defence sector in 1993-2023.

Russia's war against Ukraine: A view from Slovakia
Thirty Years of Slovak Security and Defence Policy

Five case studies review Russian propaganda narratives and malign influence channels before the invasion in the first months of the war.

Exploring the extent, scope and prevalence of antisemitic prejudice in the four Visegrad countries. 

New Propaganda and Disinformation Challenges in the Changing Environment
Survey on Antisemitic Prejudice in the Visegrad Countries

Findings of a four-year research project on the foreign policy-related votes of MEPs. 

Inauthentic online behavior in the V4 concerning Russia’s war against Ukraine.

MEPs from CE: Bulwark against Authoritarianism
The Russia-Ukraine War in Social Media
Content © 2006 Inštitút pre verejné otázky.
Design © 2006 Komplot
Generated by Buxus content management system from ui42.


tlačiťposlaťhore